Afternoon iKyu-riskers! I know, I know, we are late to the party. Valentine Month dusked down. MahaShivratri brought power and MahaKumbh’s end bought a lot of shakti and stories. And Holi just blasted a colourful exuberance of fresh spectrum of ideas…
Scorching heat is on the rise, but we are being boiled NOT by the Sun Shine, but Chin-Shine. We have a lot to catch on. But before that:
🚨(Not so lively) LIFE UPDATE: I committed a crime last week. I started my YouTube Channel and Joined Instagram (full-time).
My YouTube Channel is an intention. A battlecry decision that now ‘no one’s going to do it’ types and so I’ll do it myself (Thanos voice), only for a few crazy ones who want to be elevated and free themselves from the noise of Clickbait content. The mission is simple: “Antidote of Clickbait Content” and the vision is to elevate the collective intellectual consciousness of people; who are done with those tricks of super-edgy editing, a lot of transitions and what not. Will do what I do best. Write my thoughts out and brutally breakdown ideas in front of a camera. No hefty editing; simply sit, record and hit publish.
After 7 years of hiatus (on & off). Yes! I’m on Instagram. Full throttle. Instagram is a platform to decode, breakdown and brutally cleanse. No breaks or detoxification. Instagram is on. Don’t know what all spectrum of content I would post, but that’s I feel ‘yuck’ by that platform, never understood the signal. But now it’s all about stories, reels, drafts and comments. Thoughts?
Because I am an exclusive X (formerly Twitter) person. I was writing exclusively on X. What I write generates around 5-10 Million monthly views and impressions and more than 100 Milliion views in a year. X was my platform. But, as my hunger to build stuff grew obsessively, I didn’t wanted to confine myself to just one platform and have a rented audience. My curiosity thirst wasn’t being quenched, so there you go…
I shared my perspective on the my first video on the channel of why I am starting a YouTube Channel. Plus I felt Instagram has changed a lot in the past few years. There’s a lot to learn. Joining Instagram with one and only one intention: “To write beautiful videos and carousels and understand the platform while I build.”
That’s it. That’s the update. Experimenting with what works on the platform. I feel an ick joining Instagram but it’s a new day, a new adventure.
Let’s get started.
Do let me know — What kind of content makes you watch YouTube and Instagram more, asking for a friend?
Now let’s get back to SHEIN-ing brighter than a diamond…
Fresh month, freshly baked. But is it made and served in India?
The series of event happened (and happening) past month was just phenomenal:
From launches of ChatGPT o3, 4.5, Claude,
we got Grok 3 with reasoning + voice; Grok 3 Voice mode is killer.
Also AI-generated gameplays, Figure new Clone Robotics model, Neo Gamma by X1, and a fusion reactor for a company.
Apple lost some control in the UK, but already announced a $500 billion investment silently shifting to India’s diaspora.
And just recently NVIDIA showcased the future of AI, Robots umbrella-d under their vision of agentic AI and partnered with Disney and Google Deepmind to incept ‘Blue’, a wall-e type robot!
This societal purge of rented culture showcases how gullible we are as a civilisation.
And that made me think…
We Indians, love operating on convenience. We love embracing curated silhouettes packaged as convenience on the surface, without thinking twice the cultural root of ‘that’ thing. Where does it originate from?
We love talking about what’s happening on foreign soil, so much, it makes our intellectual brain twitch. Why? Because their quality of ‘anything’ supersedes our humane expectations. This seeking of ‘convenience’ has made us mediocre-consumers backboned in the stereotype of price-resistive market. And thus opens doors for each and every enterprise to ship/sell sub-par quality products at a premium price. This should boil your blood. But it won’t.
Exactly. Convenience.
This gets funny. When there’s convenience involved, even so-called “enemy” country feels like enigma. Cultural roots are important for showing off, but other times…not so much.
This same psychological trick of selling something as fashion, fast — People of India are quick to adapt, pass over and stand in line, again. And for what?
It is the price? Is it the variety? Is it the very nature of commodity in a low trust society of India?
That’s the adventure cart our edition is added to.
India has always been in the grey. It has been a pattern.
Look at how Colonial bastards came on our shore. Gave us a lot of stuff to get started, but what they took from us is unprecedented. The transaction (loot) they did to us, we are still recovering from it. 76 years. 76 YEARS!
But did we learn anything? That’s rare.
THE (K)EY NOTES:
The (K)urrent: The Tech-Tryst Cult
The (K)réme: The Indo-China Cult
The (K)inK: The Schwezuan-Sattuh Cult
A civilisation becomes bendable when initially you give them crumbles of ‘convenience’. India’s foundation was rebuilt on class divide. Class divide breaded cultural divide.
When we were supposed to put our heads down and wear the greased cape of the Industrial Revolution, we were busy toiling what Colonial dogs left to us. Some foreign-settling aspiration and a lot of English to swallow.
We didn’t pick up the Industrial pace as our neighbours did. And what happened? Things that were supposed to happen, China became a manufacturing powerhouse. We still are stuck selling ‘conventional’ dreams.
American gave the world, Innovation.
China gave the world, Manufacturing.
India gave the world…Service Industry.
Do you find something hilarious here? Two countries that focused on Nation building and not personal endeavours initially are far more ahead in terms of Economical growth, world leadership and humanity future orientation.
India is not.
But as they say; Time changes, so do men. Same kind of doorway we stand, and this time the entire script is same except one minute difference.
This time the reign is in our hand. Yes. In India’s hand.
Why compare colonial debauchery to something as simple as an e-commerce transaction?
Cultural roots.
But there’s too much to decipher, and we only have few minutes. India is a relic of punctual consumerism. Time is everything. Fashion is too fast here.
Why sentiment heavy India is embracing the come back of a fast fashion brand under the label of Reliance?
Is it not hampering our cultural identity or is it fair to ignore any trade war when convenience (and Reliance) plays a big role?
Why are we heading towards this “Schezwan-Sattuh” cult?
Why blurring the divide between Made In India with Made in CHINA SHEINA?
Let’s brutally breakdown🪓 this reliant move by Reliance empire to go beyond borders and bring back a fast fashion chain and package it as Made for India. Did they find the new OIL for youngsters or is this a long haul game he is playing after Budget 2025 is about to alter purchase behaviour, too much steam to blow off in today’s Valentine edition ofinK by iKyu.
But before we deep dive, let’s begin with India by iKyu…
inK by iKyu is a reader-supported publication. To receive freshly baked breakdowns and support our “subscription-driven publication”, consider becoming iKyu’s inKrediblesubscriber.
THE (K)URRENT
THE TECH-TRYST CULT…
SATYA’S QUANTAM VACHANN
My keyboard crumbles while I write this but credit due where it’s deserved—Satya’s crushed it. Microsoft’s Majorana 1. A quantum chip, unveiled by Satya Nadella, is a savage leap forward—built on a new state of matter, topoconductors, it’s the world’s first QPU with topological qubits. Eight qubits now, scaling to a million, it promises stability and speed that could gut modern encryption, turbocharge drug discovery, and juice AI beyond imagination. Error rates? Slashed below 1 in 1000. Think silicon transistor-level disruption—only fiercer. Nadella calls it a 20-year chase ending in a computing revolution. Years, not decades, to flip the world upside down. Quantum’s here, and it’s a brutal beast unleashed.
THE END OF MAHAKUMBH
Mahakumbh 2025 ended with Mahashivratri, with a jaw-dropping 66 crore devotees—half of India’s population—dipping in the Triveni Sangam over 45 days. Once a global poster child for India’s poverty, it’s now a colossal celebration of Bharat and Sanatan Dharma. The numbers are insane: 8 crore on Mauni Amavasya alone, averaging over 1 crore daily. This wasn’t just gigantic—it was a beautiful, phenomenal middle finger to the old narrative. With ₹3 lakh crore pumped into Uttar Pradesh’s economy, Mahakumbh roared as a festival of faith, unity, and raw power.
CRED’S COUTURE
CRED’s latest shindig unveiled ‘Svalbard’—a flashy credit management suite—aiming to juice up its 14 million users’ financial game. With revenue soaring 66% to ₹2,473 crore in FY24 and losses slashed 41% to ₹609 crore, this launch could turbocharge growth by cross-selling to its 1.15 crore monthly transacting users. Loan books hit ₹19,000 crore, and new mutual fund-backed credit lines scream profit potential. But here’s the kicker: overhyping a cluttered fintech space risks alienating users with complexity. Execution’s the devil—screw it up, and CRED’s $6.4 billion valuation could wobble.
THE (K)REMÉ
THE INDO-CHINA CULT…
Reliance Industries, under the leadership of Mukesh Ambani, has indeed stirred debate by partnering with Shein, a Chinese fast-fashion giant, to reintroduce it to India in February 2025—nearly five years after its ban in 2020 amid nationalistic fervor and geopolitical tensions with China. The ban, which affected over 300 Chinese apps, was framed by the Indian government as a response to national security and data privacy threats following border clashes.
This move was widely seen as a “surgical strike” against Chinese economic influence, resonating with a surge in nationalistic sentiment. So why would Reliance, a homegrown conglomerate deeply embedded in India’s economic fabric, seemingly defy this sentiment by bringing Shein back? The decision is less about breaking nationalism and more about pragmatic economics, strategic positioning, and a nuanced recalibration of India’s global trade stance. Let’s unpack this.
Reliance isn’t acting against nationalistic sentiment so much as capitalizing on an opportunity that aligns with India’s broader economic goals—goals that the government itself tacitly supports, as evidenced by its approval of this partnership. Here’s why:
Tapping a Lucrative Market: India’s fast-fashion market is booming, projected to surpass $50 billion by FY31 according to Redseer Strategy Consultants. Shein, with its global revenue of $23 billion in 2023 and a track record of disrupting markets with trendy, affordable clothing, fills a gap left by its 2020 exit. Competitors like Urbanic, Romwe, and Zudio have gained ground, but none have matched Shein’s scale or cult following among Indian youth. Reliance, whose e-commerce arm Ajio has struggled against giants like Flipkart’s Myntra, sees Shein as a way to bolster its online fashion dominance.
Local Manufacturing Boost: A key condition of Shein’s return is that all products sold in India are designed and manufactured locally by Indian suppliers. This aligns with the “Make in India” initiative, a cornerstone of the government’s economic nationalism. By integrating over 25,000 local MSMEs into Shein’s supply chain, Reliance is creating jobs and boosting textile exports—Shein plans to source from India for its global operations, not just the domestic market. This turns a “Chinese” brand into a vehicle for Indian economic growth, softening the nationalistic critique.
Data Sovereignty Compliance: The 2020 ban hinged on data privacy fears. Reliance’s deal ensures all customer data stays in India, hosted on local infrastructure, with Shein having no access. This addresses the original security concerns, allowing Reliance to frame the partnership as a safe, India-centric move rather than a capitulation to China.
Profit Without Equity Risk: Reliance pays Shein a licensing fee to use its brand and technology, but there’s no equity stake involved. This keeps Reliance in full control, minimizing financial exposure while leveraging Shein’s global brand equity—a low-risk, high-reward play.
SHEIN/OMICS
While the economic rationale is clear, there’s a deeper strategic game at play. Reliance isn’t just chasing profits; it’s positioning itself—and India—in a shifting global landscape. Here’s what might be lurking beneath the surface:
Countering E-commerce Rivals: Reliance’s retail empire faces fierce competition from Amazon, Flipkart, and Meesho. Shein’s low-cost, trend-driven model, paired with Reliance’s logistics and retail network (including Ajio and offline stores), could attract price-sensitive Gen Z shoppers, giving Reliance an edge in a crowded market. This isn’t about nationalism—it’s about market share.
Geopolitical Judo: By turning Shein into a tool for Indian manufacturing and exports, Reliance is subtly flipping the script on India-China tensions. Instead of shunning Chinese brands, it’s co-opting one to serve Indian interests, reducing Shein’s reliance on China’s supply chain (a move Shein itself wants amid U.S. scrutiny). This could signal a pragmatic shift in India’s approach: less outright rejection, more strategic engagement.
Testing Regulatory Waters: The government’s approval of this deal, after rigorous checks by ministries like IT and Home Affairs, suggests a willingness to relax the hardline anti-China stance when economic benefits are clear. Reliance, with its clout, might be pioneering a model for other foreign firms to re-enter India via local partnerships—paying a “gate fee” to smooth regulatory hurdles, as some have speculated.
Brand Portfolio Power Play: Reliance already manages a diverse fashion portfolio, from luxury labels like Giorgio Armani to affordable brands on Ajio. Adding Shein as a standalone fast-fashion powerhouse (rather than folding it into Ajio) diversifies its offerings and targets a distinct demographic, potentially pressuring rivals like Tata’s Zudio and Myntra to rethink their strategies.
TL;DR
Critics might argue Reliance is undermining the 2020 ban’s nationalistic spirit, especially given the BJP-led government’s tough rhetoric on China. Posts on X have accused the move of favoring “corporate friends” over sovereignty. Yet, the government’s green light—coupled with Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal’s endorsement of the deal’s job-creation and data-security benefits—suggests this isn’t a betrayal of nationalism but a reframing of it. Reliance is betting that economic nationalism (jobs, manufacturing, exports) trumps symbolic nationalism (banning Chinese brands outright) in the public eye.
The hidden strategy might also reflect Reliance’s long game: cementing itself as India’s indispensable retail and tech titan, capable of navigating geopolitical complexities others can’t. By localizing Shein’s operations and aligning with policy priorities, Reliance mitigates the “Chinese” stigma while reaping the rewards of a global brand. It’s a calculated risk—consumer backlash over Shein’s origins could still emerge—but one backed by a government that sees the economic upside.
In short, Reliance didn’t break nationalistic sentiment; it bent it to fit a profitable, India-first narrative. The strategy? Use Shein’s allure to fuel Reliance’s growth, strengthen India’s manufacturing base, and outmaneuver e-commerce rivals—all while keeping the government onside. Whether this gamble pays off depends on how Indian shoppers and regulators respond in the long run.
The (K)inK.
“Internet piK of the week”
A beautiful splash. This moment captures Sunita Williams and Butch Wilmore, along with their Crew-9 teammates Nick Hague and Aleksandr Gorbunov successfully returned to Earth.
The Schwezuan-Sattuh Cult
Let’s get one thing straight: Reliance bringing Shein back to India isn’t some sellout to Chinese overlords—it’s a masterstroke, a middle finger to the sanctimonious Schwezuan-Sattuh Cult screeching about nationalism from their ivory towers. You know the type—self-righteous X warriors and armchair patriots who think banning a fashion app in 2020 won Red Fort back from invaders. Spoiler: it didn’t.
What it did was leave a gaping hole in India’s fast-fashion market, ripe for Reliance to exploit in 2025 with a deal so slick it’s practically dripping in ghee. And good for them. Good for us.
The Cult—let’s call them what they are: a mob of saffron-tinted keyboard crusaders—lost their minds when Shein, the Chinese fast-fashion devil, slinked back into India under Reliance’s wing. “Betrayal!” they howled, clutching their tricolors like it’s 1947. Meanwhile, Mukesh Ambani’s playing 4D chess, turning a “foreign threat” into an Indian cash cow. Shein’s not here to colonize your wardrobe with Beijing’s finest; it’s being forced to stitch every thread in India, hire Indian workers, and keep every byte of your data on Indian soil. That’s not a sellout—that’s a heist. Reliance snatched Shein’s brand, its tech, its global hype, and made it a desi powerhouse. The Cult’s too busy chanting “Boycott China” to notice they’re the ones getting played.
Here’s the brutal truth: nationalism isn’t waving a flag—it’s jobs, money, and power. Reliance gets that.
India’s fast-fashion market is a $50 billion goldmine by 2031, and while the Schwezuan-Sattuh brigade was busy burning effigies, Urbanic and Zudio were eating Shein’s lunch. Reliance said, “Nah, that’s ours.” Now, 25,000 Indian MSMEs are gearing up to churn out Shein’s trendy tees, not for some Shanghai warehouse, but for export to the world.
This isn’t just about dressing Gen Z cheap—it’s about making India a textile titan. The government, with its “Make in India” obsession, signed off faster than you can say “data sovereignty.” Piyush Goyal’s practically salivating over the jobs. The Cult? Still crying about 2020’s border skirmishes like it’s their personal Kargil.
And let’s talk strategy, because this is where Reliance flexes. They’re not just slapping Shein’s logo on Ajio—they’re keeping it standalone, a lean, mean, rival-crushing machine. Flipkart’s Myntra, Amazon, Meesho—they’re sweating. Shein’s dirt-cheap prices and TikTok-fueled hype are a bazooka in Reliance’s retail arsenal, and they didn’t even give Shein equity. Just a licensing fee. That’s like renting a Ferrari for the price of a rickshaw. The Schwezuan-Sattuh Cult sees a Chinese ghost; Reliance sees a profit rocket.
Sure, the optics sting—Shein’s Chinese roots clash with the Cult’s anti-China gospel. But wake up: India’s not banning Huawei or Xiaomi phones you’re tweeting from. This is pragmatism, not betrayal. Reliance is betting you’ll buy the Rs. 500 skirt before you burn it, and they’re right.
The Cult can scream all they want—India’s winning, Reliance is thriving, and Shein’s just a pawn.
